🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Legal Matter

The federal appeals court ruled on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials assert that local officers have command of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing command of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”